Mend.io vs. Endor Labs
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Mend.io | Endor Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.8 |
| Review count | 123 | 10 |
| Ease of use | 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Ease of setup | 8.5 | 9.2 |
| Quality of support | 8.9 | 9.9 |
| Meets requirements | 8.8 | 9.3 |
| NPS | 54.700855 | 90 |
| Small Business | 35.8% | 10.0% |
| Mid-Market | 31.7% | 60.0% |
| Enterprise | 32.5% | 30.0% |
| Total page views | 757 | 535 |
| Total LLM citations | 5,945 | 2,267 |
Mend.io
Modern risk doesn't live in one layer, it lives between them. Mend.io is built for every risk, across AI and AppSec, securing the code layer, the AI layer, and the interactions between them. From discovery and red teaming to guardrails and runtime protection, Mend.io delivers continuous protection across the entire AI application lifecycle. Mend.io solutions include: 1. Mend AI secures the layer where modern risk actually lives—the interaction between code and AI.
- Scanning Efficiency
- Ease of Use
- Scanning Technology
- Vulnerability Detection
- Easy Integrations
- Customer Support
Endor Labs
Endor Labs turns application security into a competitive advantage. At the core is AURI, the security harness for agentic development. It helps coding agents write secure code by default, automates PR security reviews, and gives agents deterministic context to fix what matters fast. At the core is our patented code context graph: a continuously updated model of application behavior across code, dependencies, secrets, and containers. The result: 83% fewer blocked PRs, 10x fewer security tickets, and 6x faster remediation at Atlassian, Cursor, Rubrik, and Snowflake.
- Features
- Ease of Use
- Security
- Customer Support
- User Interface
- Vulnerability Detection