MediaFire vs. Fastio
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | MediaFire | Fastio |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Review count | 43 | 51 |
| Ease of use | 0.0 | 8.8 |
| Ease of setup | 0.0 | 8.8 |
| Quality of support | 0.0 | 8.5 |
| Meets requirements | 0.0 | 8.7 |
| NPS | 44.186047 | 43.137255 |
| Small Business | 67.4% | 56.0% |
| Mid-Market | 25.6% | 38.0% |
| Enterprise | 7.0% | 6.0% |
| Total page views | 206 | 631 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,232 | 16 |
MediaFire
MediaFire: Simple file storage and sharing, trusted for 20 years More than 200 million people have used MediaFire to store, share, and send files since 2006. Upload anything, share it right away with a link, and keep your files with you on any device. ✓ Share anything: Send files and folders by link, email, or social, with no bandwidth or download limits on ad-supported downloads ✓ Big files welcome: Upload up to 50 GB per file on paid plans, and upload hundreds of files at once ✓ Control who gets your files: One-Time Links that work for a single download, password-protected files, and
Fastio
Fastio: The AI-first workspace where people and AI agents work on the same files Fastio gives teams one place to store, share, and work on content, with AI built into every workspace. It's a modern alternative to Box, Dropbox, and Google Drive for teams that use AI agents alongside people. ✓ Built-in AI: Every file is indexed automatically, so you can search by meaning, ask questions across a workspace, and get answers that cite the source files ✓ AI agents as teammates: Connect Claude or your own agents through MCP, the REST API, or the CLI, each with its own scoped permissions and a full
- Ease of Use
- Simple
- Speed Efficiency
- File Sharing
- Security
- Easy Setup