Macaw Agency Management System vs. BrokerageBuilder
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Macaw Agency Management System | BrokerageBuilder |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 3.3 | 3.6 |
| Review count | 18 | 16 |
| Ease of use | 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Ease of setup | 6.7 | 4.6 |
| Quality of support | 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Meets requirements | 7.9 | 8.2 |
| NPS | -25 | -6.25 |
| Small Business | 76.5% | 50.0% |
| Mid-Market | 17.6% | 50.0% |
| Enterprise | 5.9% | 0.0% |
| Total page views | 28 | 131 |
| Total LLM citations | 30 | 291 |
Macaw Agency Management System
Macaw Agency Management System supports the functions and workflows of Insurance Agencies, Brokers and Managing General Agents. The functional areas supported are CRM, Sales, Underwriting, Policy management, Claims recording and tracking, Billing, Payments, Customer self-service and Producer self-service. The front end is responsive and mobile-enabled. The insurance products across lines of business are configurable, and hence easy to change. The Rating and Underwriting capabilities are extremely detailed and flexible.
- Policy Management
- Workflow Efficiency
- Efficiency
- Time Saving
- Email Integration
- Ease of Use
BrokerageBuilder
BrokerageBuilder is an agency management system (AMS) built specifically for employee benefits brokerages. It centralizes group and plan data, automates renewal workflows, streamlines carrier RFPs, and tracks commissions — all in one platform purpose-built for how benefits teams work, not adapted from a P&C system. If you're running a benefits brokerage, your problems are specific: renewal seasons that overwhelm your team, RFPs that take hours to build, commissions that are hard to reconcile, and client proposals that should look more professional than they do.