G2 Vendor Directory

juno.one vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

Metricjuno.one

by DENEVY

OpenText Application Quality Management

by OpenText

Overall rating4.44.0
Review count56133
Ease of use9.18.2
Ease of setup9.57.6
Quality of support9.78.0
Meets requirements9.28.5
NPS69.09090931.2
Small Business51.8%12.8%
Mid-Market32.1%21.1%
Enterprise16.1%66.2%
Total page views30311
Total LLM citations34753

juno.one

Looking for a tool to efficiently manage projects and track tasks? Juno.one offers a complete solution with modules like TimeSheet, Roadmaps, Dashboard, Testing, and Docs. With Roadmaps, you can easily plan project progress, and TimeSheet helps track the time spent on tasks. The Testing module simplifies test case management, and Docs keeps all your important documents in one place. Whether you're a project manager or a team member, juno.one helps you keep everything under control.

Pros

    OpenText Application Quality Management

    Micro Focus is now part of OpenText! OpenText™ Application Lifecycle Management (ALM)/Quality Center empowers you to achieve high efficiency in testing and manage quality with a requirements-driven, risk-based approach, align people with processes, mitigate application complexities, automate manual tasks, and establish end-to-end traceability. Gaining a complete view across all releases and projects grants you insights that help informed decisions.

    Pros

    • Customer Support
    • Ease of Use
    • Implementation Ease
    • Features
    • Project Management
    • Usage Frequency