G2 Vendor Directory

IoT Security vs. Portnox

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricIoT Security

by ZingBox

Portnox

by Portnox

Overall rating4.54.4
Review count12123
Ease of use9.68.8
Ease of setup9.38.4
Quality of support9.28.9
Meets requirements9.29.2
NPS7561.788618
Small Business41.7%16.7%
Mid-Market25.0%43.0%
Enterprise33.3%40.4%
Total page views146967
Total LLM citations2953,298

IoT Security

To instill trust in the diverse IoT infrastructure, ZingBox invented the IoT personality-based approach to secure IoT. Each IoT device exhibits certain limited set of functions, flow and vulnerabilities regardless of where it is deployed, a.k.a IoT personality. This approach discerns each device's behaviors and detects any unusual activities to enforce trust amongst connected devices. Traditional security solutions focus on data protection; ZingBox goes further to provide service protection for business continuity.

Pros

    Portnox

    Portnox delivers continuous, zero-trust access control for every identity, human and non-human, securing local network and remote access from a single, cloud-native platform. It continuously verifies access based on identity context, device posture, and risk signals, unifying passwordless authentication, policy enforcement, and automated response through one policy engine.

    Pros

    • Ease of Use
    • Setup Ease
    • Implementation Ease
    • Customer Support
    • Security
    • Cloud Services