IoT Security vs. FortiNAC
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | IoT Security | FortiNAC |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Review count | 12 | 20 |
| Ease of use | 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Ease of setup | 9.3 | 7.9 |
| Quality of support | 9.2 | 8.4 |
| Meets requirements | 9.2 | 8.8 |
| NPS | 75 | 55 |
| Small Business | 41.7% | 10.0% |
| Mid-Market | 25.0% | 55.0% |
| Enterprise | 33.3% | 35.0% |
| Total page views | 146 | 235 |
| Total LLM citations | 295 | 1,077 |
IoT Security
To instill trust in the diverse IoT infrastructure, ZingBox invented the IoT personality-based approach to secure IoT. Each IoT device exhibits certain limited set of functions, flow and vulnerabilities regardless of where it is deployed, a.k.a IoT personality. This approach discerns each device's behaviors and detects any unusual activities to enforce trust amongst connected devices. Traditional security solutions focus on data protection; ZingBox goes further to provide service protection for business continuity.
FortiNAC
FortiNAC provides the network visibility to see everything connected to the network, as well as the ability to control those devices and users, including dynamic, automated responses.