G2 Vendor Directory

Instasafe ZTAA vs. UTunnel VPN and ZTNA

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricInstasafe ZTAA

by InstaSafe Technologies

UTunnel VPN and ZTNA

by Secubytes LLC

Overall rating4.74.8
Review count4624
Ease of use9.39.7
Ease of setup9.39.5
Quality of support9.49.5
Meets requirements9.69.6
NPS86.36363695.833333
Small Business15.2%70.8%
Mid-Market54.3%25.0%
Enterprise30.4%4.2%
Total page views164225
Total LLM citations183197

Instasafe ZTAA

InstaSafe is redefining the challenge of secure access to modern networks by leveraging Zero Trust principles with its security solutions, that ensure seamless access to cloud applications, SAP applications, on-premise data, IoT devices, and multiple other neoteric use cases. Instasafe discards traditional VPN based conceptions of a network perimeter, instead moving the perimeter to the individual users and the devices they access. The Zero Trust approach followed by InstaSafe mandates a “never trust, always verify' approach to privileged access, without focusing on network locality.

Pros

    UTunnel VPN and ZTNA

    UTunnel offers scalable Cloud VPN and Zero-Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solutions that enable secure connectivity and seamless remote access to your business network resources. With automated deployment options for both cloud and on-premise environments, UTunnel simplifies the setup process, allowing you to configure organization-wide ZTNA and VPN services in just minutes using its Access Gateway (VPNaaS) and MeshConnect (ZTNA and Mesh Networking) solutions.

    Pros

    • Secure Access
    • Ease of Use
    • Setup Ease
    • Performance Efficiency
    • Security
    • Pricing