G2 Vendor Directory

Instasafe ZTAA vs. MetaAccess

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricInstasafe ZTAA

by InstaSafe Technologies

MetaAccess

by OPSWAT

Overall rating4.73.9
Review count4614
Ease of use9.38.0
Ease of setup9.36.4
Quality of support9.46.3
Meets requirements9.67.7
NPS86.36363621.428571
Small Business15.2%21.4%
Mid-Market54.3%42.9%
Enterprise30.4%35.7%
Total page views164144
Total LLM citations183118

Instasafe ZTAA

InstaSafe is redefining the challenge of secure access to modern networks by leveraging Zero Trust principles with its security solutions, that ensure seamless access to cloud applications, SAP applications, on-premise data, IoT devices, and multiple other neoteric use cases. Instasafe discards traditional VPN based conceptions of a network perimeter, instead moving the perimeter to the individual users and the devices they access. The Zero Trust approach followed by InstaSafe mandates a “never trust, always verify' approach to privileged access, without focusing on network locality.

Pros

    MetaAccess

    Zero-Trust Access (ZTA), an approach that considers all entities untrusted by default, is rapidly becoming the industry standard and being mandated by regulatory bodies including governments. Leveraging the latest ZTA technologies, OPSWAT’s MetaAccess Zero-Trust Access Platform is a unified platform cloud solution for providing deep endpoint compliance, advanced endpoint protection, identity authorization, and secure access without hindering workflows. MetaAccess delivers security compliance, visibility, and control to every device and user accessing enterprise resources.

    Pros