IBM Vault (formerly HashiCorp Vault) vs. Protegrity
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | IBM Vault (formerly HashiCorp Vault) | Protegrity |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 56 | 14 |
| Ease of use | 8.0 | 9.0 |
| Ease of setup | 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Meets requirements | 8.9 | 9.3 |
| NPS | 54.545455 | 57.142857 |
| Small Business | 25.5% | 23.1% |
| Mid-Market | 32.7% | 46.2% |
| Enterprise | 41.8% | 30.8% |
| Total page views | 761 | 307 |
| Total LLM citations | 2,166 | 666 |
IBM Vault (formerly HashiCorp Vault)
IBM Vault (formerly HashiCorp Vault) tightly controls access to secrets and encryption keys by authenticating against trusted sources of identity such as Active Directory, LDAP, Kubernetes, CloudFoundry, and cloud platforms. Vault enables fine grained authorization of which users and applications are permitted access to secrets and keys. Some of Vault's main use cases include: - Secrets Management - Identity Brokering - Data Encryption
- Security
- Ease of Use
- Integrations
- Easy Integrations
- Customer Support
- Management Ease
Protegrity
Protegrity secures the data and knowledge layer AI runs on, binding protection directly to the data itself rather than locking access around it. Its platform tokenizes, encrypts, and masks sensitive data at the field and knowledge-graph level, enforcing policy in real time at the point of a prompt, query, or answer — across AWS, Azure, GCP, and OpenShift, with FIPS-validated, post-quantum-ready cryptography.