IBM Engineering Test Management vs. TestResults
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | IBM Engineering Test Management | TestResults |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.1 | 4.9 |
| Review count | 25 | 11 |
| Ease of use | 7.6 | 9.0 |
| Ease of setup | 9.1 | 9.5 |
| Quality of support | 7.9 | 10.0 |
| Meets requirements | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| NPS | 27.777778 | 90.909091 |
| Small Business | 4.0% | 27.3% |
| Mid-Market | 36.0% | 54.5% |
| Enterprise | 60.0% | 18.2% |
| Total page views | 88 | 59 |
| Total LLM citations | 70 | 20 |
IBM Engineering Test Management
Increase efficiency and quality of software delivery with test planning, workflow control, tracking, and metrics reporting. Available on prem and as SaaS. Use comprehensive test plans Use test plans that are customizable live artifacts which capture a variety of testing activity dimensions. Meet regulatory requirements Provides help to meet regulatory requirements and get ready for compliance audits. Get reporting with a purpose Always have an accurate real-time status without having to ping each and every team member.
TestResults
TestResults is an enterprise software test automation platform that uses computer vision and deep learning to interact with applications like a human user - by looking at the screen, not by reading code or hidden element IDs. Unlike traditional test automation tools relying on object identifiers, XPath selectors, or API hooks, TestResults uses a locally deployed AI model to visually recognize UI elements and understand their context. This means tests remain stable even when the underlying code, element IDs, or UI layout change between releases. Who is it for?
- Customer Support
- Ease of Use
- Automation Support
- Automation
- Learning Efficiency
- Ease of Learning