G2 Vendor Directory

IBM Engineering Test Management vs. Qase

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricIBM Engineering Test Management

by IBM

Qase

by Qase Inc

Overall rating4.14.7
Review count25321
Ease of use7.69.4
Ease of setup9.19.4
Quality of support7.99.7
Meets requirements9.29.1
NPS27.77777884.227129
Small Business4.0%58.1%
Mid-Market36.0%34.5%
Enterprise60.0%7.3%
Total page views882,196
Total LLM citations7010,797

IBM Engineering Test Management

Increase efficiency and quality of software delivery with test planning, workflow control, tracking, and metrics reporting. Available on prem and as SaaS. Use comprehensive test plans Use test plans that are customizable live artifacts which capture a variety of testing activity dimensions. Meet regulatory requirements Provides help to meet regulatory requirements and get ready for compliance audits. Get reporting with a purpose Always have an accurate real-time status without having to ping each and every team member.

Pros

    Qase

    Qase is a test management platform for QA and development teams responsible for quality. It brings CI results, automated test runs, and manual test cases into one system of record, so you can tell whether a release is ready from the data, not from a Slack thread or a judgment call. As a product grows, test results spread out. They sit across CI pipelines, spreadsheets, and issue trackers, with no single view tying them together. Requirements lose their link to test outcomes, so when something breaks in production it's hard to reconstruct what was tested.

    Pros

    • Ease of Use
    • Customer Support
    • Helpful
    • Integrations
    • Test Cases
    • User Interface