G2 Vendor Directory

IBM Engineering Test Management vs. OpenText Application Quality Management

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricIBM Engineering Test Management

by IBM

OpenText Application Quality Management

by OpenText

Overall rating4.14.0
Review count25133
Ease of use7.68.2
Ease of setup9.17.6
Quality of support7.98.0
Meets requirements9.28.5
NPS27.77777831.2
Small Business4.0%12.8%
Mid-Market36.0%21.1%
Enterprise60.0%66.2%
Total page views88311
Total LLM citations70753

IBM Engineering Test Management

Increase efficiency and quality of software delivery with test planning, workflow control, tracking, and metrics reporting. Available on prem and as SaaS. Use comprehensive test plans Use test plans that are customizable live artifacts which capture a variety of testing activity dimensions. Meet regulatory requirements Provides help to meet regulatory requirements and get ready for compliance audits. Get reporting with a purpose Always have an accurate real-time status without having to ping each and every team member.

Pros

    OpenText Application Quality Management

    Micro Focus is now part of OpenText! OpenText™ Application Lifecycle Management (ALM)/Quality Center empowers you to achieve high efficiency in testing and manage quality with a requirements-driven, risk-based approach, align people with processes, mitigate application complexities, automate manual tasks, and establish end-to-end traceability. Gaining a complete view across all releases and projects grants you insights that help informed decisions.

    Pros

    • Customer Support
    • Ease of Use
    • Implementation Ease
    • Features
    • Project Management
    • Usage Frequency