G2 Vendor Directory

IBM Cloud File Storage vs. Google Cloud NetApp Volumes

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricIBM Cloud File Storage

by IBM

Google Cloud NetApp Volumes

by Google

Overall rating4.44.2
Review count1410
Ease of use9.19.4
Ease of setup8.610.0
Quality of support9.09.0
Meets requirements9.38.6
NPS64.28571450
Small Business35.7%20.0%
Mid-Market35.7%20.0%
Enterprise28.6%60.0%
Total page views6680
Total LLM citations5488

IBM Cloud File Storage

IBM Cloud file storage leads the industry in performance cost ratios, security and versatility. And now you can try a volume with your current projects. For a limited time, get 1 TB of file storage endurance tiers at .25, 2, 4 or 10 IOPS with 1 TB of snapshot space.

Pros

    Google Cloud NetApp Volumes

    NetApp® Cloud Volumes for Google Cloud is a fully managed or self-managed file service that is integrated into Google Cloud with the multiprotocol support, performance, and availability required to run business-critical applications. It is designed to provide massively parallel shared access to thousands of Google Compute Engine and Google Kubernetes Engine instances, enabling your applications to achieve high levels of aggregate throughput and IOPS with consistent low latencies. Use cases. Customers can use the service to migrate existing enterprise applications to Google Cloud.

    Pros

    • Integrations
    • Features
    • Cloud Services
    • Storage Solutions
    • Backup
    • Cost-Effective