IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL vs. Amazon Aurora
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL | Amazon Aurora |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.7 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 14 | 456 |
| Ease of use | 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Ease of setup | 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Quality of support | 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Meets requirements | 9.5 | 9.1 |
| NPS | 84.615385 | 65.517241 |
| Small Business | 14.3% | 37.7% |
| Mid-Market | 28.6% | 33.8% |
| Enterprise | 57.1% | 28.5% |
| Total page views | 79 | 391 |
| Total LLM citations | 66 | 1,532 |
IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL
IBM Cloud Databases for MySQL is a fast, easy-to-use, and flexible RDBMS. As the central component of the LAMP model, it sports a number of connectors, including Python, PHP and C++ for development needs. MySQL is a popular choice because of its flexibility and vast supported ecosystem.
Amazon Aurora
Amazon Aurora is a fully managed relational database service that combines the performance and availability of high-end commercial databases with the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of open-source databases. Compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL, Aurora delivers up to five times the throughput of standard MySQL databases and up to three times that of standard PostgreSQL databases. It is designed for high availability, offering up to 99.99% availability within a single region and up to 99.999% across multiple regions.
- Scalability
- Ease of Use
- Availability
- Performance
- Reliability
- High Availability