IBM Cloud Container Registry vs. Google Artifact Registry
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | IBM Cloud Container Registry | Google Artifact Registry |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Review count | 16 | 24 |
| Ease of use | 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Ease of setup | 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Quality of support | 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Meets requirements | 9.0 | 8.9 |
| NPS | 73.333333 | 62.5 |
| Small Business | 31.3% | 58.3% |
| Mid-Market | 37.5% | 16.7% |
| Enterprise | 31.3% | 25.0% |
| Total page views | 55 | 42 |
| Total LLM citations | 65 | 768 |
IBM Cloud Container Registry
Detach the containers registry from IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service. Store and distribute Docker images via a stateless, highly scalable server side application
Google Artifact Registry
Artifact Registry The next generation of Container Registry. Store, manage, and secure your build artifacts.