G2 Vendor Directory

Hive vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricHive

by The Apache Software Foundation

IBM Netezza Performance Server

by IBM

Overall rating4.24.1
Review count6084
Ease of use8.69.0
Ease of setup8.18.6
Quality of support8.08.6
Meets requirements8.58.6
NPS43.85964929.411765
Small Business11.7%12.0%
Mid-Market35.0%26.5%
Enterprise53.3%61.4%
Total page views310180
Total LLM citations204131

Hive

Hive provides a mechanism to project structure onto this data and query the data using a SQL-like language called HiveQL. At the same time this language also allows traditional map/reduce programmers to plug in their custom mappers and reducers when it is inconvenient or inefficient to express this logic in HiveQL.

Pros

    IBM Netezza Performance Server

    Integrates database, server, storage and analytics into a single system with petabyte scalability. Fast analytics Provides a high-performance, massively parallel system that enables you to gain insight from your data and perform analytics on very large data volumes. Smart, efficient queries Simplifies analytics by consolidating all activity in one place, where the data resides. Simplified infrastructure Easy to deploy and manage; simplifies your data warehouse and analytic infrastructure. Does not require tuning, indexing or aggregated tables and needs minimal administration.

    Pros

    • Speed
    • Performance
    • Ease of Use
    • Fast Processing
    • Large Datasets
    • Powerful BI