G2 Vendor Directory

Google Cloud Memorystore vs. ScyllaDB

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricGoogle Cloud Memorystore

by Google

ScyllaDB

by ScyllaDB

Overall rating4.34.5
Review count48429
Ease of use8.98.8
Ease of setup9.18.5
Quality of support8.88.8
Meets requirements8.89.0
NPS6067.058824
Small Business37.5%41.7%
Mid-Market35.4%29.6%
Enterprise27.1%28.7%
Total page views251,114
Total LLM citations6073,096

Google Cloud Memorystore

Cloud Memorystore for Redis provides a fully managed in-memory data store service built on scalable, secure, and highly available infrastructure managed by Google. Use Cloud Memorystore to build application caches that provides sub-millisecond data access. Cloud Memorystore is compatible with the Redis protocol, allowing easy migration with zero code changes.

Pros

    ScyllaDB

    ScyllaDB is a specialty database for workloads that require predictable performance at scale. It’s adopted by organizations that require ultra-low latency, even at millions of features or operations per second, billions of embeddings, or petabytes of storage. ScyllaDB’s shard-per-core architecture taps the full power of modern infrastructure, translating to fewer nodes, less admin, and lower costs. Over 400 companies such as Disney+, Discord, Tripadvisor, Expedia, Zillow, Starbucks, and Comcast use ScyllaDB for their toughest database challenges.

    Pros

    • Performance
    • Speed
    • Scalability
    • Low Latency
    • Ease of Use
    • Querying