Good Grants vs. Zealous
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Good Grants | Zealous |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 4.7 |
| Review count | 90 | 16 |
| Ease of use | 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Ease of setup | 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Quality of support | 9.4 | 10.0 |
| Meets requirements | 8.9 | 9.6 |
| NPS | 66.666667 | 81.25 |
| Small Business | 71.6% | 93.3% |
| Mid-Market | 23.5% | 6.7% |
| Enterprise | 4.9% | 0.0% |
| Total page views | 932 | 169 |
| Total LLM citations | 2,495 | 424 |
Good Grants
Good Grants is an internationalised grantmaking platform that helps small to medium sized grantmakers around the world affordably accept, manage and fund good grant applications, their way. Designed for grantmakers who have outgrown manual processes and spreadsheet program management, Good Grants offers an attractive alternative to overpriced grantmaking software. How does it help? Good Grants empowers grantmakers to manage the entire grant lifecycle, streamline processes and optimise funding, from wherever they are, online.
Zealous
Zealous is a cloud-based submissions management platform for any program that collects and evaluates entries: awards, competitions, grants, open calls, residencies, fairs, and commissions. One subscription covers unlimited programs, so an awards program in spring, a grant round in autumn, and a residency call in winter all run from the same dashboard, with the same login and the same support team. Entry collection, judging, payments, and results live in one place instead of spread across forms, spreadsheets, and email. Zealous is built around presentation.