Four Eyes Surveys vs. Ideally
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Four Eyes Surveys | Ideally |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.1 | 4.8 |
| Review count | 12 | 64 |
| Ease of use | 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Ease of setup | 7.1 | 9.5 |
| Quality of support | 8.4 | 9.9 |
| Meets requirements | 8.7 | 9.0 |
| NPS | 25 | 93.548387 |
| Small Business | 50.0% | 29.7% |
| Mid-Market | 8.3% | 51.6% |
| Enterprise | 41.7% | 18.8% |
| Total page views | 14 | 657 |
| Total LLM citations | 6 | 691 |
Four Eyes Surveys
FourEyes is the first survey platform that not only makes it easy to send beautiful surveys - it also makes sense of your responses for you. Their data mining engine is so powerful, it finds insights where other software will just spew out numbers. In fact, we are so committed to incredible analysis, you can create and send surveys 100% free. Because the survey is not the point. Actionable insights are the point.
Ideally
Ideally is a self-service consumer research platform built for the speed that the market actually moves at. No briefing cycles. No six-figure projects. Highest-rated consumer research platform on G2, 4.8/5.0. Rated higher than Qualtrics, Suzy, Attest, and Zappi. 8+ million consumer questions answered across 30+ countries. Trusted by 250+ brands and agencies across the US, UK and APAC trust Ideally, including Treasury Wine Estates, Burger King, Google and Rémy Cointreau. Most brands make their biggest decisions on thin evidence. Slow data, old insight, or a gut call. Ideally fixes that.
- Ease of Use
- Efficiency
- Intuitive
- Helpful
- Customer Support
- Insights