FortiNAC vs. Portnox
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | FortiNAC | Portnox |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Review count | 20 | 123 |
| Ease of use | 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Ease of setup | 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Quality of support | 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Meets requirements | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| NPS | 55 | 61.788618 |
| Small Business | 10.0% | 16.7% |
| Mid-Market | 55.0% | 43.0% |
| Enterprise | 35.0% | 40.4% |
| Total page views | 235 | 967 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,077 | 3,298 |
FortiNAC
FortiNAC provides the network visibility to see everything connected to the network, as well as the ability to control those devices and users, including dynamic, automated responses.
Portnox
Portnox delivers continuous, zero-trust access control for every identity, human and non-human, securing local network and remote access from a single, cloud-native platform. It continuously verifies access based on identity context, device posture, and risk signals, unifying passwordless authentication, policy enforcement, and automated response through one policy engine.
- Ease of Use
- Setup Ease
- Implementation Ease
- Customer Support
- Security
- Cloud Services