Fingerprint vs. Pipl
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Fingerprint | Pipl |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.7 | 4.4 |
| Review count | 454 | 44 |
| Ease of use | 9.5 | 9.3 |
| Ease of setup | 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Quality of support | 9.5 | 9.3 |
| Meets requirements | 9.3 | 8.7 |
| NPS | 88.325991 | 60.465116 |
| Small Business | 59.5% | 51.2% |
| Mid-Market | 34.5% | 30.2% |
| Enterprise | 6.0% | 18.6% |
| Total page views | 7,434 | 429 |
| Total LLM citations | 20,578 | 5,402 |
Fingerprint
So powerful, many of our competitors listed here on G2 use Fingerprint open-source under the hood. Stop fraud, detect bots or delight customers with our device intelligence API. Fingerprint offers industry-leading accurate visitor IDs that last for months instead of days, fast with a simple API call for real-time decisioning, and actionable with device intelligence, enabling users to make smarter decisions.
- Ease of Use
- Setup Ease
- Ease of Setup
- Easy Integrations
- Accuracy
- Efficiency
Pipl
Pipl is an identity intelligence company built on 20+ years of data spanning 5 billion unique identities. Our Elephant large risk model combines identity, payment, behavioral, and device signals to help businesses approve more good customers, reduce fraud, and cut manual review. Pipl serves fraud prevention, identity resolution, and background check use cases across industries worldwide.
- Efficiency
- User Interface
- Ease of Use
- Time-saving
- Geolocation Search
- Customization