Fingerprint vs. IPQS
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Fingerprint | IPQS |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 454 | 116 |
| Ease of use | 9.5 | 9.3 |
| Ease of setup | 9.4 | 9.0 |
| Quality of support | 9.5 | 9.2 |
| Meets requirements | 9.3 | 9.2 |
| NPS | 88.325991 | 77.586207 |
| Small Business | 59.5% | 62.9% |
| Mid-Market | 34.5% | 25.0% |
| Enterprise | 6.0% | 12.1% |
| Total page views | 7,434 | 756 |
| Total LLM citations | 20,578 | 7,146 |
Fingerprint
So powerful, many of our competitors listed here on G2 use Fingerprint open-source under the hood. Stop fraud, detect bots or delight customers with our device intelligence API. Fingerprint offers industry-leading accurate visitor IDs that last for months instead of days, fast with a simple API call for real-time decisioning, and actionable with device intelligence, enabling users to make smarter decisions.
- Ease of Use
- Setup Ease
- Ease of Setup
- Easy Integrations
- Accuracy
- Efficiency
IPQS
IPQS is a fraud prevention and threat intelligence platform that helps businesses detect and stop fraud in real time. Device fingerprinting, IP reputation analysis, and email and phone validation combine into actionable risk signals that prevent account takeover, fake account creation, payment fraud, bot abuse, and other forms of online fraud. The difference is the data. Over 10,000 honeypot sensors across the web feed exclusive intelligence on human-like bots, residential proxies, low-quality emails, and stolen user data — updated continuously rather than on a monthly refresh.
- Accuracy
- Fraud Detection
- Accuracy of Information
- Data Accuracy
- Reliability
- Fraud Prevention