Filtered vs. Jobma
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Filtered | Jobma |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 | 4.7 |
| Review count | 16 | 170 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 10.0 | 8.8 |
| Quality of support | 10.0 | 8.9 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.3 |
| NPS | 93.75 | 87.037037 |
| Small Business | 33.3% | 53.5% |
| Mid-Market | 40.0% | 32.4% |
| Enterprise | 26.7% | 14.1% |
| Total page views | 28 | 805 |
| Total LLM citations | 38 | 1,663 |
Filtered
Filtered’s modern approach to hiring technical talent increases your efficiency and effectiveness. With Filtered, companies can automate and streamline the hiring process with customized and automatically-graded job simulations so that only qualified candidates are advanced to interview rounds. The end result is a process that yields better candidates for hiring managers and gives applicants clearer insight into the actual tech stack they’ll be working with on a daily basis.
Jobma
Intelligent, Human-first Hiring System: Jobma promises innovative, compliant hiring solutions built to scale and deliver ROI through intelligent AI video interviewing and assessments. The platform integrates video interviewing and advanced AI capabilities - including AI scoring and summarization to support consistent, data-backed decisions, alongside AI proctoring and candidate verification to safeguard interview integrity. The result is a more standardized, secure, and insight-driven hiring process that aligns with the demands of high-volume, distributed talent acquisition.
- Ease of Use
- Time-saving
- Candidate Management
- Time Saving
- Interviewing Process
- Question Quality