Filtered vs. Hirevue
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Filtered | Hirevue |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 | 4.1 |
| Review count | 16 | 255 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Ease of setup | 10.0 | 8.7 |
| Quality of support | 10.0 | 8.8 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 8.7 |
| NPS | 93.75 | 42.971888 |
| Small Business | 33.3% | 9.8% |
| Mid-Market | 40.0% | 15.7% |
| Enterprise | 26.7% | 74.5% |
| Total page views | 28 | 1,609 |
| Total LLM citations | 38 | 19,339 |
Filtered
Filtered’s modern approach to hiring technical talent increases your efficiency and effectiveness. With Filtered, companies can automate and streamline the hiring process with customized and automatically-graded job simulations so that only qualified candidates are advanced to interview rounds. The end result is a process that yields better candidates for hiring managers and gives applicants clearer insight into the actual tech stack they’ll be working with on a daily basis.
Hirevue
"Hirevue is a skills-based hiring software platform that helps talent acquisition and HR teams evaluate job candidates, validate role-relevant capabilities, conduct structured interviews, and automate recruiting workflows. It is designed for enterprise and growing organizations managing high-volume or critical hiring across roles, regions, and candidate populations. The platform combines interviewing, assessments, candidate engagement, and workflow automation in one hiring experience.
- Ease of Use
- Candidate Management
- Interview Management
- Scheduling Ease
- Time-saving
- Interview Process