Filtered vs. Evalart
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Filtered | Evalart |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 | 4.8 |
| Review count | 16 | 25 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 9.9 |
| Ease of setup | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Quality of support | 10.0 | 9.9 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.5 |
| NPS | 93.75 | 95.652174 |
| Small Business | 33.3% | 77.3% |
| Mid-Market | 40.0% | 18.2% |
| Enterprise | 26.7% | 4.5% |
| Total page views | 28 | 78 |
| Total LLM citations | 38 | 223 |
Filtered
Filtered’s modern approach to hiring technical talent increases your efficiency and effectiveness. With Filtered, companies can automate and streamline the hiring process with customized and automatically-graded job simulations so that only qualified candidates are advanced to interview rounds. The end result is a process that yields better candidates for hiring managers and gives applicants clearer insight into the actual tech stack they’ll be working with on a daily basis.
Evalart
Evalart helps companies identify the best candidates in their selection processes thanks to its comprehensive library of assessments. Evalart includes psychometric tests, coding assessments, aptitude tests and many other kinds of assessments. Evalart also includes advanced features like remote proctoring, plagiarism detection, test creation, customization and everything you need for pre-employment screening.