G2 Vendor Directory

Filtered vs. Coensio

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricFiltered

by Filtered.ai

Coensio

by Coensio

Overall rating4.94.7
Review count1628
Ease of use9.29.7
Ease of setup10.08.8
Quality of support10.09.7
Meets requirements9.69.3
NPS93.7582.142857
Small Business33.3%42.3%
Mid-Market40.0%38.5%
Enterprise26.7%19.2%
Total page views28136
Total LLM citations3847

Filtered

Filtered’s modern approach to hiring technical talent increases your efficiency and effectiveness. With Filtered, companies can automate and streamline the hiring process with customized and automatically-graded job simulations so that only qualified candidates are advanced to interview rounds. The end result is a process that yields better candidates for hiring managers and gives applicants clearer insight into the actual tech stack they’ll be working with on a daily basis.

Pros

    Coensio

    Coensio transforms the hiring process by eliminating inefficiencies and bias at the earliest stage of the funnel. Short, cost-effective assessments go out automatically to every applicant, so talent is evaluated on demonstrated ability rather than on how a resume reads. The result is a +90% test completion rate and precise candidate scores that give hiring teams a defensible shortlist without hours of manual CV screening. Beyond assessments, Coensio covers the full pre-screening layer with three AI interview formats.

    Pros