Filtered vs. CodeSubmit
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Filtered | CodeSubmit |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 | 4.9 |
| Review count | 16 | 14 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 8.7 |
| Ease of setup | 10.0 | 7.7 |
| Quality of support | 10.0 | 8.9 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 8.3 |
| NPS | 93.75 | 100 |
| Small Business | 33.3% | 85.7% |
| Mid-Market | 40.0% | 14.3% |
| Enterprise | 26.7% | 0.0% |
| Total page views | 28 | 55 |
| Total LLM citations | 38 | 154 |
Filtered
Filtered’s modern approach to hiring technical talent increases your efficiency and effectiveness. With Filtered, companies can automate and streamline the hiring process with customized and automatically-graded job simulations so that only qualified candidates are advanced to interview rounds. The end result is a process that yields better candidates for hiring managers and gives applicants clearer insight into the actual tech stack they’ll be working with on a daily basis.
CodeSubmit
Make Better Hiring Decisions With Take-Home Coding Challenges With CodeSubmit, you Identify great candidates using real tasks, not brainteasers. Streamline your tech recruiting workflow and hire the right person for the job.