Filtered vs. CoderPad
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Filtered | CoderPad |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 | 4.4 |
| Review count | 16 | 470 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 10.0 | 9.1 |
| Quality of support | 10.0 | 8.9 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 8.9 |
| NPS | 93.75 | 63.74502 |
| Small Business | 33.3% | 55.4% |
| Mid-Market | 40.0% | 30.2% |
| Enterprise | 26.7% | 14.4% |
| Total page views | 28 | 40,687 |
| Total LLM citations | 38 | 11,178 |
Filtered
Filtered’s modern approach to hiring technical talent increases your efficiency and effectiveness. With Filtered, companies can automate and streamline the hiring process with customized and automatically-graded job simulations so that only qualified candidates are advanced to interview rounds. The end result is a process that yields better candidates for hiring managers and gives applicants clearer insight into the actual tech stack they’ll be working with on a daily basis.
CoderPad
CoderPad is a leading, AI-forward assessment platform that helps talent acquisition teams accurately evaluate skills and make confident hiring decisions faster. Candidates prefer the CoderPad platform by 7:1 over traditional coding platforms. CoderPad is a comprehensive assessment platform trusted by more than 4,000 of the world’s top companies worldwide, including over 20% of the Fortune 100 and 2/3 of the Forbes AI 50 list. The platform has hosted more than 4 million technical interviews across 99+ languages.
- Ease of Use
- Experience
- User Interface
- Coding Skills
- Time-saving
- Setup Ease