Filtered vs. Codeaid
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Filtered | Codeaid |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 | 4.8 |
| Review count | 16 | 26 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 9.7 |
| Ease of setup | 10.0 | 9.6 |
| Quality of support | 10.0 | 9.6 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.5 |
| NPS | 93.75 | 92.307692 |
| Small Business | 33.3% | 88.5% |
| Mid-Market | 40.0% | 11.5% |
| Enterprise | 26.7% | 0.0% |
| Total page views | 28 | 57 |
| Total LLM citations | 38 | 53 |
Filtered
Filtered’s modern approach to hiring technical talent increases your efficiency and effectiveness. With Filtered, companies can automate and streamline the hiring process with customized and automatically-graded job simulations so that only qualified candidates are advanced to interview rounds. The end result is a process that yields better candidates for hiring managers and gives applicants clearer insight into the actual tech stack they’ll be working with on a daily basis.
Codeaid
Codeaid helps recruiters and companies hire the best software developers by testing them with robust, everyday projects that show their on-the-job skills. This platform will allow you to evaluate candidates by testing not only specific languages or frameworks but also coding fundamentals and application design concepts while having the most automated test scoring system and the longest duration of tests on the market.