Filtered vs. Qualified.io
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Filtered | Qualified.io |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 | 4.8 |
| Review count | 16 | 408 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 9.5 |
| Ease of setup | 10.0 | 9.4 |
| Quality of support | 10.0 | 9.4 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.5 |
| NPS | 93.75 | 88.917526 |
| Small Business | 33.3% | 59.7% |
| Mid-Market | 40.0% | 23.6% |
| Enterprise | 26.7% | 16.7% |
| Total page views | 28 | 131 |
| Total LLM citations | 38 | 745 |
Filtered
Filtered’s modern approach to hiring technical talent increases your efficiency and effectiveness. With Filtered, companies can automate and streamline the hiring process with customized and automatically-graded job simulations so that only qualified candidates are advanced to interview rounds. The end result is a process that yields better candidates for hiring managers and gives applicants clearer insight into the actual tech stack they’ll be working with on a daily basis.
Qualified.io
Qualified is a performance based platform that allows organizations to use coding assessments and pair programming interviews to vet technical talent. Unlike other platforms, we use actual unit tests and a wide range of language specific testing frameworks that better predict actual on the job performance. Any assessment can easily be turned into a pair-programming session and all assessments can be timed and recorded in order to give hiring managers a deeper level of insight into each candidates thought process and problem solving ability.
- User Interface
- Clear Instructions
- Customization
- Ease of Use