Filtered vs. Alooba
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Filtered | Alooba |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 | 4.4 |
| Review count | 16 | 13 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 9.5 |
| Ease of setup | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Quality of support | 10.0 | 9.8 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.5 |
| NPS | 93.75 | 81.818182 |
| Small Business | 33.3% | 30.8% |
| Mid-Market | 40.0% | 30.8% |
| Enterprise | 26.7% | 38.5% |
| Total page views | 28 | 53 |
| Total LLM citations | 38 | 95 |
Filtered
Filtered’s modern approach to hiring technical talent increases your efficiency and effectiveness. With Filtered, companies can automate and streamline the hiring process with customized and automatically-graded job simulations so that only qualified candidates are advanced to interview rounds. The end result is a process that yields better candidates for hiring managers and gives applicants clearer insight into the actual tech stack they’ll be working with on a daily basis.
Alooba
Alooba is a data skills assessment platform. Companies big and small rely on Alooba to easily, fairly & automatically evaluate the data skills of their candidates and team. With more than 3500 expert written questions across 50+ different technical data skills and soft skills to choose from, you no longer have to create and maintain your own clunky tests. With Alooba you can avoid bad hires, automate painful time-wasters like manual CV screening and give every candidate the same chance to shine.