Filtered vs. Adaface
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Filtered | Adaface |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 16 | 45 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 9.3 |
| Ease of setup | 10.0 | 9.4 |
| Quality of support | 10.0 | 9.1 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.0 |
| NPS | 93.75 | 73.333333 |
| Small Business | 33.3% | 35.6% |
| Mid-Market | 40.0% | 53.3% |
| Enterprise | 26.7% | 11.1% |
| Total page views | 28 | 113 |
| Total LLM citations | 38 | 1,088 |
Filtered
Filtered’s modern approach to hiring technical talent increases your efficiency and effectiveness. With Filtered, companies can automate and streamline the hiring process with customized and automatically-graded job simulations so that only qualified candidates are advanced to interview rounds. The end result is a process that yields better candidates for hiring managers and gives applicants clearer insight into the actual tech stack they’ll be working with on a daily basis.
Adaface
Adaface is the most candidate friendly skills assessment tool on the market. Adaface helps companies automate the first round interviews with a conversational chatbot, Ada. Candidates prefer Adaface because Ada engages with a friendly chat involving relevant challenges as opposed to asking trick questions on a test. At Adaface, we set up 45 min candidate-friendly assessments that test for on-the-job skills. 💼 Here's what we're doing differently from the status quo: 1.
- Question Quality
- Assessments
- Real-world Scenarios
- Question Variety
- Accuracy
- Ease of Use