G2 Vendor Directory

F5 NGINX Ingress Controller vs. F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricF5 NGINX Ingress Controller

by F5

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

by F5

Overall rating4.64.5
Review count1740
Ease of use9.29.1
Ease of setup9.28.9
Quality of support9.48.8
Meets requirements9.49.3
NPS76.47058873.529412
Small Business11.8%8.1%
Mid-Market64.7%21.6%
Enterprise23.5%70.3%
Total page views162186
Total LLM citations5871,146

F5 NGINX Ingress Controller

NGINX Ingress Controller provides Kubernetes traffic management with API gateway, identity, and observability features. NGINX Ingress Controller provides a feature set to secure, strengthen, and scale containerized apps, including: Advanced app‑centric configuration – Use role‑based access control (RBAC) and self‑service to set up security guardrails (not gates), so teams can manage their apps securely and with agility. Enable multi‑tenancy, reusability, and simpler configs.

Pros

  • Integrations
  • Scaling
  • Traffic Management
  • Configuration Ease

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)

F5 BIG-IP LTM optimizes the speed and reliability of your applications via both network and application layers. Using real-time protocol and traffic management decisions based on application and server conditions, extensive connection management, and TCP and content offloading, BIG-IP LTM dramatically improves application and infrastructure responsiveness. LTM's full proxy architecture give users protocol awareness to control traffic for the most important applications.

Pros

  • Features
  • Configuration Ease
  • Security
  • Reliability
  • Load Balancing
  • Simple