G2 Vendor Directory

Cybereason Defense Platform vs. IBM QRadar EDR

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricCybereason Defense Platform

by Cybereason

IBM QRadar EDR

by IBM

Overall rating4.44.2
Review count1847
Ease of use8.88.7
Ease of setup8.97.7
Quality of support8.28.4
Meets requirements8.59.1
NPS61.11111144.444444
Small Business22.2%44.7%
Mid-Market16.7%40.4%
Enterprise61.1%14.9%
Total page views24057
Total LLM citations4514

Cybereason Defense Platform

Cybereason automatically detects malicious activity and presents it in an intuitive way. It deploys easily with minimal organizational impact and provides end-to-end context of an attack campaign. Most organizations deploy Cybereason and start detecting attacks within 24 to 48 hours.

Pros

  • Cybersecurity
  • Security
  • Ease of Use
  • Easy Setup
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Setup Ease

IBM QRadar EDR

IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. IBM Security QRadar EDR is available on AWS Marketplace. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users protected.

Pros

  • Threat Detection
  • Ease of Use
  • Cybersecurity
  • Detection Efficiency
  • Protection
  • Monitoring