Conduit vs. Capacity
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Conduit | Capacity |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Review count | 20 | 119 |
| Ease of use | 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Ease of setup | 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Quality of support | 9.5 | 9.6 |
| Meets requirements | 9.1 | 9.3 |
| NPS | 78.947368 | 80.733945 |
| Small Business | 90.0% | 34.7% |
| Mid-Market | 10.0% | 40.7% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% | 24.6% |
| Total page views | 312 | 954 |
| Total LLM citations | 142 | 2,249 |
Conduit
Conduit's AI agents handle customer conversations across SMS, WhatsApp, email, voice, social, and more — answering questions, processing requests, and following up, all without adding headcount. Where most automation stops at sending messages, Conduit's agents hold real two-way conversations. They book reservations, process refunds, qualify leads, and escalate to a human when the situation calls for it. Every interaction is logged and cross-channel context is maintained, so nothing falls through when a customer switches channels.
Capacity
Capacity is a unified CX Automation Platform engineered to eliminate the operational chaos of rising support costs, fragmented technology, and increasing customer expectations. Built specifically for the modern contact center, Capacity connects your enterprise knowledge, data, and systems into a single AI Knowledge Orchestration Layer.
- Ease of Use
- Helpful
- Efficiency
- Easy Setup
- Customer Support
- Intuitive