G2 Vendor Directory

Common Voice dataset vs. Appen

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricCommon Voice dataset

by Mozilla

Appen

by Appen

Overall rating4.54.2
Review count1135
Ease of use8.48.5
Ease of setup8.68.9
Quality of support8.38.4
Meets requirements8.38.4
NPS63.63636436.363636
Small Business63.6%51.4%
Mid-Market27.3%25.7%
Enterprise9.1%22.9%
Total page views161,012
Total LLM citations118,281

Common Voice dataset

Each entry in the dataset consists of a unique MP3 and corresponding text file. Many of the 1,368 recorded hours in the dataset also include demographic metadata like age, sex, and accent that can help train the accuracy of speech recognition engines. The dataset currently consists of 1,087 validated hours in 18 languages, but we're always adding more voices and languages.

Pros

    Appen

    Appen collects and labels images, text, speech, audio, video, and other data to create training data used to build and continuously improve the world’s most innovative artificial intelligence systems. We offer a state of the art, licensable data annotation platform to annotate training data use cases in computer vision and natural language processing. Our platform enhances accuracy and efficiency through our Smart Labeling and Pre-Labeling features which use Machine Learning to ease human annotations.

    Pros

    • Useful
    • Flexibility
    • Ease of Use