Cody vs. Cursor
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Cody | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 10 | 329 |
| Ease of use | 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Ease of setup | 9.0 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Meets requirements | 8.4 | 9.2 |
| NPS | 50 | 79.076923 |
| Small Business | 60.0% | 71.3% |
| Mid-Market | 30.0% | 21.3% |
| Enterprise | 10.0% | 7.5% |
| Total page views | 53 | 3,632 |
| Total LLM citations | 197 | 30,409 |
Cody
Cody is an AI-powered code summarization and review tool, designed to integrate seamlessly as a GitHub Action or GitLab pipeline. It serves as an interface between your repository and leading AI language models, such as OpenAI's GPT-4 and Google's Gemini. When you submit a Pull Request on GitHub or a Merge Request on GitLab, Cody automatically summarizes your changes and reviews your code with the expertise typical of a senior software engineer from a top tech company.
- Coding Assistance
- Useful
- Features
- Time-saving
- Ease of Use
- Easy Integrations
Cursor
Cursor is an agentic coding platform for enterprises building ambitious software. With access to frontier models, developers can focus on higher-level direction, while agents drive implementation and code review. Used by 64% of Fortune 500 companies, Cursor accelerates software development without compromising quality, control, or security. Key Features and Functionality: - Agentic development workflows: Cursor helps developers delegate coding tasks to agents while staying in control of direction, review, and iteration.
- Ease of Use
- Coding Assistance
- Features
- Performance Speed
- Problem Solving
- Time-saving