CodeSonar vs. OpenText Core Application Security
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | CodeSonar | OpenText Core Application Security |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.1 |
| Review count | 13 | 34 |
| Ease of use | 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Ease of setup | 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Quality of support | 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Meets requirements | 8.6 | 8.4 |
| NPS | 53.846154 | 47.058824 |
| Small Business | 30.8% | 32.4% |
| Mid-Market | 38.5% | 26.5% |
| Enterprise | 30.8% | 41.2% |
| Total page views | 122 | 260 |
| Total LLM citations | 305 | 557 |
CodeSonar
As a leading provider of static application security testing (SAST) solutions, CodeSecure helps software developers solve challenging issues throughout the software development life cycle (SDLC) to protect mission-critical software and devices from failure and cyberattack. By enabling developers to shift security testing left, CodeSecure CodeSonar seamlessly integrates into CI/CD and DevSecOps tools to assist developers in designing, developing, and deploying trusted software applications – meeting standards, minimizing risk and accelerating projects to gain a competitive advantage.
OpenText Core Application Security
Fortify on Demand (FoD) is a complete Application Security as a Service solution. It offers an easy way to get started with the flexibility to scale. In addition to static and dynamic, Fortify on Demand covers in-depth mobile app security testing, open-source analysis, and vendor application security management. False positives are removed for every test and test results can be manually reviewed by application security experts.