CodeScan vs. OpenText Core Application Security
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | CodeScan | OpenText Core Application Security |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.6 | 4.1 |
| Review count | 34 | 34 |
| Ease of use | 8.8 | 8.4 |
| Ease of setup | 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Quality of support | 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Meets requirements | 8.7 | 8.4 |
| NPS | 73.333333 | 47.058824 |
| Small Business | 17.6% | 32.4% |
| Mid-Market | 38.2% | 26.5% |
| Enterprise | 44.1% | 41.2% |
| Total page views | 112 | 260 |
| Total LLM citations | 224 | 557 |
CodeScan
CodeScan Shield addresses code quality, security, and compliance liabilities with two automated modules: CodeScan and OrgScan. CodeScan provides static code analysis for total visibility into code health from the moment it’s written through production. OrgScan governs organizational policies by enforcing the security and compliance rules mandated for your Salesforce environment. Together, they ensure the code that makes up your Salesforce environment and the way the environment is being utilized will always meet high standards.
OpenText Core Application Security
Fortify on Demand (FoD) is a complete Application Security as a Service solution. It offers an easy way to get started with the flexibility to scale. In addition to static and dynamic, Fortify on Demand covers in-depth mobile app security testing, open-source analysis, and vendor application security management. False positives are removed for every test and test results can be manually reviewed by application security experts.