CockroachDB vs. ScyllaDB
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | CockroachDB | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 29 | 429 |
| Ease of use | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Ease of setup | 9.2 | 8.5 |
| Quality of support | 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Meets requirements | 8.9 | 9.0 |
| NPS | 55.555556 | 67.058824 |
| Small Business | 55.2% | 41.7% |
| Mid-Market | 34.5% | 29.6% |
| Enterprise | 10.3% | 28.7% |
| Total page views | 429 | 1,114 |
| Total LLM citations | 3,436 | 3,096 |
CockroachDB
Overview Cockroach Labs is the creator of CockroachDB, the cloud-native, resilient, distributed SQL database enterprises worldwide trust to run mission-critical AI and other applications that scale fast, avert and survive disaster, and thrive everywhere. It runs on the Big 3 clouds, on prem, and in hybrid configurations powering Fortune 500, Forbes Global 2000, and Inc.
- Scalability
- Database Management
- Performance
- Ease of Use
- High Availability
- Flexibility
ScyllaDB
ScyllaDB is a specialty database for workloads that require predictable performance at scale. It’s adopted by organizations that require ultra-low latency, even at millions of features or operations per second, billions of embeddings, or petabytes of storage. ScyllaDB’s shard-per-core architecture taps the full power of modern infrastructure, translating to fewer nodes, less admin, and lower costs. Over 400 companies such as Disney+, Discord, Tripadvisor, Expedia, Zillow, Starbucks, and Comcast use ScyllaDB for their toughest database challenges.
- Performance
- Speed
- Scalability
- Low Latency
- Ease of Use
- Querying