ClusterControl vs. Supabase
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | ClusterControl | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 16 | 241 |
| Ease of use | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 8.8 | 9.2 |
| Quality of support | 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Meets requirements | 8.6 | 9.3 |
| NPS | 75 | 79.831933 |
| Small Business | 31.3% | 77.2% |
| Mid-Market | 31.3% | 20.3% |
| Enterprise | 37.5% | 2.5% |
| Total page views | 111 | 2,127 |
| Total LLM citations | 310 | 23,761 |
ClusterControl
ClusterControl enables you to implement full lifecycle automation for your open-source database footprints in on-premises, in the cloud, or in hyrbrid environments. ClusterControl supports MongoDB, Elasticsearch, TimescaleDB, Redis, Vlakey, Galera, SQL Server on Linux, PostgreSQL, MariaDB and MySQL.
- Helpful
- Ease of Use
- Documentation
Supabase
Supabase is an open-source backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platform that enables developers to build and scale applications efficiently without managing server infrastructure. Launched in 2020 as an alternative to Firebase, Supabase offers a suite of tools including a PostgreSQL database, authentication, real-time subscriptions, and storage capabilities. By leveraging the robustness of PostgreSQL, Supabase provides a scalable and secure foundation for modern web and mobile applications.
- Ease of Use
- Features
- User-Friendly
- Easy Integrations
- Setup Ease
- Integrations