CEMS vs. Trace
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | CEMS | Trace |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.6 | 4.9 |
| Review count | 14 | 15 |
| Ease of use | 9.3 | 9.9 |
| Ease of setup | 7.6 | 9.8 |
| Quality of support | 8.7 | 9.9 |
| Meets requirements | 9.4 | 9.6 |
| NPS | 76.923077 | 100 |
| Small Business | 21.4% | 60.0% |
| Mid-Market | 28.6% | 33.3% |
| Enterprise | 50.0% | 6.7% |
| Total page views | 29 | 192 |
| Total LLM citations | 11 | 606 |
CEMS
CEMS is a complete solution for continuous emission monitoring, utilising the extractive dilution monitoring method.
Trace
Leading Australian companies use Trace to meet their ASRS and AASB S2 reporting obligations with confidence. Trace brings together purpose-built software and expert-led delivery, from climate risk assessments to emissions data to assurance-ready disclosures, so reporting is accurate, repeatable and audit-ready.
- Sustainability
- Features
- Innovation
- Analytics
- Ease of Use
- Intuitive