G2 Vendor Directory

Canonical LXD vs. Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS)

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricCanonical LXD

by Canonical Ltd.

Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS)

by Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Overall rating4.44.5
Review count16111
Ease of use8.18.7
Ease of setup8.18.7
Quality of support8.39.0
Meets requirements8.79.2
NPS68.7574.311927
Small Business56.3%27.3%
Mid-Market25.0%43.6%
Enterprise18.8%29.1%
Total page views32261
Total LLM citations34551

Canonical LXD

Canonical LXD is a next generation system container manager.It offers a user experience similar to virtual machines but using Linux containers instead.It's image based with pre-made images available for a wide number of Linux distributions and is built around a very powerful, yet pretty simple, REST API.

Pros

  • Features
  • Container Management
  • Simple
  • Installation Ease
  • Reliability

Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS)

Amazon Elastic Container Service for Kubernetes (Amazon EKS) makes it easy to deploy, manage, and scale containerized applications using Kubernetes on AWS. Amazon EKS runs the Kubernetes management infrastructure for you across multiple AWS availability zones to eliminate a single point of failure. Amazon EKS is certified Kubernetes conformant so you can use existing tooling and plugins from partners and the Kubernetes community. Applications running on any standard Kubernetes environment are fully compatible and can be easily migrated to Amazon EKS.

Pros

  • Scalability
  • Ease of Use
  • Integrations
  • Cost-Effective
  • Documentation
  • Setup Ease