Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. N-able Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) | N-able Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.1 |
| Review count | 15 | 18 |
| Ease of use | 8.0 | 8.9 |
| Ease of setup | 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Quality of support | 7.9 | 9.0 |
| Meets requirements | 8.8 | 8.9 |
| NPS | 50 | 44.444444 |
| Small Business | 35.7% | 50.0% |
| Mid-Market | 21.4% | 50.0% |
| Enterprise | 42.9% | 0.0% |
| Total page views | 114 | 137 |
| Total LLM citations | 4 | 294 |
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Detect, isolate, and eliminate intrusions across all endpoints using AI, automated incident generation, and unparalleled threat intelligence.
N-able Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
N-able Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), powered by SentinelOne®, helps MSPs and IT departments prevent, detect, and quickly respond to ever-changing cyberthreats with behavioral AI threat detection, automated remediation, and rollback. Leverage powerful EDR integration with the N‑able N‑sight RMM or N‑able N‑central solutions to gain holistic monitoring and management capabilities.
- Incident Response
- Threat Detection
- Customer Support
- XDR Capabilities
- Ease of Use
- Implementation Ease