Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. Intezer
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) | Intezer |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 15 | 193 |
| Ease of use | 8.0 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Meets requirements | 8.8 | 9.1 |
| NPS | 50 | 70.053476 |
| Small Business | 35.7% | 54.4% |
| Mid-Market | 21.4% | 23.3% |
| Enterprise | 42.9% | 22.3% |
| Total page views | 114 | 615 |
| Total LLM citations | 4 | 3,185 |
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Detect, isolate, and eliminate intrusions across all endpoints using AI, automated incident generation, and unparalleled threat intelligence.
Intezer
Intezer automates the entire alert triage process, like an extension of your team handling Tier 1 SOC tasks for every alert at machine-speed. Intezer monitors incoming incidents from endpoint, reported phishing pipelines, or SIEM tools, then autonomously collects evidence, investigates, makes triage decisions, and escalates only the serious threats to your team for human intervention.
- Security
- Security Protection
- Ease of Use
- Malware Protection
- Detection Accuracy
- Cybersecurity