Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. IBM QRadar EDR
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) | IBM QRadar EDR |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.2 |
| Review count | 15 | 47 |
| Ease of use | 8.0 | 8.7 |
| Ease of setup | 8.6 | 7.7 |
| Quality of support | 7.9 | 8.4 |
| Meets requirements | 8.8 | 9.1 |
| NPS | 50 | 44.444444 |
| Small Business | 35.7% | 44.7% |
| Mid-Market | 21.4% | 40.4% |
| Enterprise | 42.9% | 14.9% |
| Total page views | 114 | 57 |
| Total LLM citations | 4 | 4 |
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Detect, isolate, and eliminate intrusions across all endpoints using AI, automated incident generation, and unparalleled threat intelligence.
IBM QRadar EDR
IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. IBM Security QRadar EDR is available on AWS Marketplace. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users protected.
- Threat Detection
- Ease of Use
- Cybersecurity
- Detection Efficiency
- Protection
- Monitoring