G2 Vendor Directory

Azure Virtual WAN vs. IBM SevOne

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricAzure Virtual WAN

by Microsoft

IBM SevOne

by IBM

Overall rating4.34.3
Review count1572
Ease of use8.08.2
Ease of setup8.68.0
Quality of support9.18.7
Meets requirements8.98.8
NPS66.66666751.428571
Small Business46.7%29.6%
Mid-Market40.0%38.0%
Enterprise13.3%32.4%
Total page views86833
Total LLM citations381,640

Azure Virtual WAN

Connect your global branch offices, point-of-sale locations, and sites using Azure and the Microsoft global network. Plan, configure, and seamlessly deploy new connections, tuned for a growing ecosystem of market-leading partners.

Pros

    IBM SevOne

    IBM® SevOne, now part of the Concert platform, gives NetOps teams deep, real-time visibility into hybrid cloud and SD-WAN performance — combining network-layer intelligence and app-aware insights to speed up resolution, reduce complexity, and ensure seamless digital experiences. In a world of hybrid clouds and ever-rising user expectations, downtime is not an option. IBM SevOne 8.0 equips NetOps teams with real-time, unified visibility across complex networks—from SD-WAN and multi-cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure) to Kubernetes.

    Pros

    • Monitoring
    • Reliability
    • Real-time Monitoring
    • Visibility
    • Dashboard Customization
    • Dashboard Features