Azure Virtual Desktop vs. Kasm Workspaces
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Azure Virtual Desktop | Kasm Workspaces |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.2 | 4.7 |
| Review count | 11 | 49 |
| Ease of use | 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Ease of setup | 9.3 | 9.4 |
| Quality of support | 8.4 | 9.6 |
| Meets requirements | 8.3 | 9.2 |
| NPS | 36.363636 | 85.714286 |
| Small Business | 9.1% | 75.5% |
| Mid-Market | 54.5% | 14.3% |
| Enterprise | 36.4% | 10.2% |
| Total page views | 39 | 894 |
| Total LLM citations | 79 | 9,788 |
Azure Virtual Desktop
The use of virtualised desktops has greatly increased over the past year, with more UK businesses than ever increasing their remote working capabilities and investing in new technologies to ensure secure remote working. Azure Virtual Desktop (formerly Windows Virtual Desktop) provides access to a fully personalised desktop from anywhere, for flexible, secure remote working.
Kasm Workspaces
The Next-Generation Workspace: Web-Native. Zero-Trust. Hyperconverged. Kasm provides capabilities not possible with your legacy workspace provider: a modern foundation for integrations, devops-enabled automation for deployment speed, data-loss-prevention controls for cybersecurity, and freedom of choice across cloud/hypervisor/infrastructure to escape vendor-lock.
- Affordable
- User-Friendly
- Customer Support
- Ease of Use
- Time Efficiency
- Easy Deployment