Azure Site Recovery vs. Druva Data Security Cloud
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Azure Site Recovery | Druva Data Security Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Review count | 40 | 746 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 9.5 |
| Ease of setup | 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Quality of support | 8.9 | 9.5 |
| Meets requirements | 9.2 | 9.5 |
| NPS | 82.857143 | 83.606557 |
| Small Business | 17.9% | 7.3% |
| Mid-Market | 35.9% | 59.2% |
| Enterprise | 46.2% | 33.6% |
| Total page views | 116 | 3,826 |
| Total LLM citations | 116 | 11,293 |
Azure Site Recovery
Recovery plans are simple to create through the Azure management portal, where they are stored. The plans can be as simple or as advanced as your business requirements demand, including the execution of custom Windows PowerShell scripts and pauses for manual interventions.
Druva Data Security Cloud
Over the past decade, data risks have diversified, shifting data protection’s role from a passive last line of defense to an active data partner in responding to and recovering from diverse data risks. Traditionally, backup solutions aimed to secure against system risks such as hardware and application failures. However, with cloud making infrastructure redundant and applications becoming more resilient, risks have shifted from infrastructure to the data layer.
- Ease of Use
- Backup Solutions
- Backup Ease
- Customer Support
- Backup Frequency
- Reliability