Azure Site Recovery vs. Commvault Cloud Rewind
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Azure Site Recovery | Commvault Cloud Rewind |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Review count | 40 | 18 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 9.7 |
| Ease of setup | 8.9 | 9.6 |
| Quality of support | 8.9 | 9.6 |
| Meets requirements | 9.2 | 9.3 |
| NPS | 82.857143 | 77.777778 |
| Small Business | 17.9% | 38.9% |
| Mid-Market | 35.9% | 27.8% |
| Enterprise | 46.2% | 33.3% |
| Total page views | 116 | 59 |
| Total LLM citations | 116 | 234 |
Azure Site Recovery
Recovery plans are simple to create through the Azure management portal, where they are stored. The plans can be as simple or as advanced as your business requirements demand, including the execution of custom Windows PowerShell scripts and pauses for manual interventions.
Commvault Cloud Rewind
Cloud application downtime causes organizations significant costs, risks, and reputation. Applications experience downtime due to ransomware attacks, cloud misconfigurations, zone-level cloud service failures, natural disasters, region failures, or simply human error. Traditional backup & recovery or DR products do not auto-program your cloud services to recover your distributed cloud environments from downtime, costing organizations precious time, labor, revenue, and reputation.